Home · Channels · Google Ads

Google Ads lead generation

Fewer leads than Meta, and they cost more. They're also people who typed the problem into a search box ten seconds ago - which is a completely different conversation for your sales team.

Book a free 30-minute audit

Why Google accounts waste money

You're bidding on intent - and paying for the intent you didn't want

Four ways search budget disappears without anything obvious showing up in the dashboard.

Broad match with no negatives

Google will spend your budget on loosely related searches - jobs, DIY, "free", competitor research - unless a negative keyword list actively stops it.

Calls nobody answers

Running call campaigns outside staffed hours is the most expensive mistake in this account type. You pay full price for a ring-out.

Everything goes to the homepage

A search for one specific service landing on a general homepage wastes the intent you just paid a premium for.

PMax running unsupervised

Performance Max will happily spend on cheap display placements and report them as conversions. Without exclusions and clean data it flatters itself.

Search budgets are small enough that waste hurts immediately - there's no volume to hide it in.

What we run on Google

Buying the searches that end in a phone call

Google vs Meta

Two channels, two jobs

  1. 01

    Google captures demand

    People already looking. Lower volume, higher cost per lead, much higher intent - and they often want to talk today.

  2. 02

    Meta creates demand

    People who weren't looking. High volume, low cost, and the only option when nobody is searching for what you sell.

  3. 03

    Most accounts need both

    Search caps out at the size of existing demand. Meta scales past it. Running only one usually means either a volume ceiling or a quality problem.

  4. 04

    Which comes first

    If people search for your category, start on Google - it's faster to prove. If they don't, Google has nothing to buy and Meta is the only real option.

For events, Google is a small branded play at best - Meta does the work there. For urgent services, Google often produces your best leads outright.

Google questions

What people ask about Google Ads

Google leads cost far more than Meta. Is it worth it?
Compare cost per customer, not cost per lead. Search leads typically convert several times better because the person was actively looking. A ₹600 Google lead closing at 20% beats a ₹100 Meta lead closing at 2%. Whether that holds in your business is exactly what the audit checks.
Should we run Performance Max?
Sometimes - but not as the first thing, and never unsupervised. PMax needs clean conversion data to work, and without it, it spends into cheap placements and reports flattering numbers. We'd normally establish search campaigns with reliable conversion tracking first, then test PMax against them.
What's the minimum budget for Google Ads?
Lower than Meta, because you're buying a smaller pool of high-intent searches. Many local service accounts run productively on ₹30,000–50,000 a month. The real constraint is search volume in your category and city, which we check before quoting anything.
We get calls but they're the wrong kind.
Usually the search terms report, not the targeting. Broad match plus a thin negative list means you're paying for adjacent searches. Reviewing actual search terms and recordings for a week normally identifies the source quickly.
Do you run our account or your own?
Yours. You own the account, the conversion history and the data. If we part ways, everything stays with you.

Paying for searches that don't convert?

Book a free 30-minute audit. We'll pull your search terms report and show you what share of spend is going to searches you never wanted.